Most analytics drown you in charts that all say the same thing: here's your P&L. Ours asks the only question that changes anything: did you trade your plan? It splits your book in two, names the gap, and that gap is your entire edge.
This is the screen the whole product is built to earn. Your net number hides the story; this one tells it. The trades that followed your planmade money. The ones that didn't bled it. Close the gap and consistency takes care of itself; that's not a promise, it's just arithmetic.
Your plan earned +$4,820. The −$1,573 leak is off-plan.
Cut the NY-PM fades. Your in-plan book is +$4,820.
The split tells you that you leak; the sections tell you where. Edge-by-setup ranks every play by real expectancy. Behavior surfaces the revenge trades and overtrading days that quietly undo a good week. Each one is a named, fixable thing, not a vague feeling that you should “be more disciplined.”
A consistent book isn't a hot streak. It's green weeks that look like each other, because the same in-plan process produced them. That repeatability is what a funded account actually rewards.
Import your trades and the split builds itself. See the leak in dollars, close it, and watch the in-plan book become the whole book.